Haikyo, Whitby Psychiatric #15
Good morning! I hope you all had a great holiday. Today we have a feature interview with documentary photographer Nico Oved. Nico's work concentrates on the relationship between people & the spaces they inhabit, or used to inhabit, as the case may be with the 3 photographs that we are lucky to feature at Photography Art Store.
YOU PREFER THE TERM “DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHER OVER “PHOTO JOURNALIST”. WHY?
I actually see my aims and those of photojournalism as identical - to shed light on a situation in the world that otherwise may go overlooked. My problem is with the style-rut I feel photojournalism has fallen into. When the word photojournalism is used, most people immediately see in their heads a black & white 35mm frame with some sort of wide angle composition of people in a dynamic relationship to each other. I feel this is an example of a "photojournalistic" shot:
Henri Cartier-Bresson, "Gestapo Informer, 1945"
These compositions were pioneered and made famous by the greats: Henri Cartier-Bresson, André Kertész, Robert Capa. However, with the modern ad-nauseum repetition of these compositions and style, the original intent of photojournalism is undermined. Rather than illustrating the specifics of each situation, each picture is reduced to archetypes of the "good guys", the "bad guys" and the "victims" - homogenizing all stories into the same narrative, the details of which are unimportant. Call me naive, but I still like to see myself as an impartial observer. I like the word "documentary" because it refers to both an impartial document and because it implies a longer view than the immediate narrative of photojournalism. I believe much photojournalism is a little slap-dash: run into a situation, find an archetypal, people-driven narrative, snap it, and get out. I avoid people in my photos mostly because I'm uninterested in making someone a poster boy for a situation or existence. I like the idea that human activity is recorded in my photos in the form of constructions, and therein lies my only narrative: "how did that get there?"
YOU’RE MOVING AWAY FROM DOCUMENTING ABANDONED SPACES & ARE NOW SHOOTING PLACES THAT ARE INHABITED. WHAT INSPIRED YOU TO MAKE THE CHANGE TO SHOOTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLE & WHERE THEY LIVE?
What initially drew me to abandoned spaces was simply an aesthetic tension - the beauty in decay. But as I shot many industrial spaces, I began to realize I was interested in the narrative of how our society had shifted from an industrial economy to a service economy. That was one narrative. One I felt I exhausted, at least for now. From there, I realized there were many narratives that could be told using this relationship between human constructions and the situations and reasons underlying them. And what really excited me was that this was a way of illustrating a narrative that didn't rely on established photo-narrative conventions.
Warehouse #6
TELL US A LITTLE ABOUT THE HAIKYO SERIES THAT “WHITBY”, “INGLIS PLANT” & “WAREHOUSE 6” CAME FROM?
Haikyo has been a popular activity in Japan for quite a while - it is the act of exploring abandoned buildings. Now there are internet communities throughout the world devoted to it. My Haikyo series is actually 3 or more projects that made up the majority of the work I did in university and helped me develop my style - experiential large format colour prints that hold a sharp focus from foreground to background. My first project was about the abandoned Stelco plant in Hamilton; the second, the abandoned Whitby Psychiatric Hospital and the third, my thesis called Haikyo Seiro, focussed on spaces in transition, but wasn't about any one space in particular.
CAN YOU DESCRIBE WHAT YOUR CREATIVE PROCESS IS? HOW DO YOU COME UP WITH THE CONCEPT FOR AN IMAGE OR SERIES?
I almost always used to work backwards. I'd picture the final product in my head down to the last detail. I'd literally see a framed print on a gallery wall, or an imagined book layout. Working that way helped me establish my aesthetic - I wanted large format colour prints. But unless these photos were shot on a large format camera with a long depth of field, there wouldn't be enough detail to justify such a large print. That said, I feel myself transitioning now... and I'm not sure where I'll be going exactly.
HOW MUCH OF YOUR WORK IS SPONTANEOUS AS OPPOSED TO CAREFULLY PLANNED OUT SHOTS?
This is one of my huge preoccupations at the moment. I find myself so overly careful and planned, that I can often become paralyzed with inaction if any of the myriad conditions surrounding a shoot are less than ideal. I'm not sure why. Is it due to the cost, time and effort expended shooting with a large format 4x5 view camera? Whatever it is, as I've begun embracing digital shooting I feel like I've become re-energized, and freed up to experiment more. It may be because there's no film or developing involved; it may just be a psychological hurdle.
HOW DO YOU DECIDE ON LOCATIONS OR SUBJECT MATTER?
That's easy - I'm simply always on the lookout for a group of people who have an interesting story that easily manifests itself in physical constructions.
WHAT DO YOU HOPE PEOPLE TAKE AWAY FROM YOUR ART?
Again, this may sound naive, but I hope someone who sees my work becomes aware that the everyday existences of vast swaths of people differ enormously from their own. I'd be extremely satisfied if through exposure to these photos, viewers are eventually able to more accurately position themselves within this world of innumerable realities and existences.
UNLIKE A LOT OF PHOTOGRAPHERS THESE DAYS YOU’VE CHOSEN TO STICK WITH FILM AS YOUR SHOOTING MEDIUM. WHY?
At first it was a technical decision. When I started, there simply was no way to get the sharpness and resolution necessary for my prints from a digital camera. Later, I began to appreciate the subtle, pastel-like tones and hues that I was getting from my long exposures on film. Now, for better or worse, this is all changing. I find myself tiring of all the work involved in scanning negatives. Especially since I'm not seeing any of the technical advantages of film anymore. Some of the new lenses for digital cameras are sharper than my 4x5 lenses. And some of the new digital camera bodies are producing so many pixels, that even the highest resolution scan of a large format negative is not getting me better information to work with. Finally, my facility in digital workflow has improved to the degree that I now trust myself to be able to reproduce those subtle tones and gradations of film with my digital files. In short, I'm currently at a crossroads where I'm trying to decide how to modify my working method to shoot digital. I feel like the time saved cutting scanning out of the process will allow me to do what I really enjoy: shoot a lot more.
WHAT ARE YOU WORKING ON RIGHT NOW? TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT CAN WE LOOK FORWARD TO NEXT?
I guess you could say I'm working on my last film project. Six months ago I returned from two years in Brazil. I worked in the big cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, but also travelled to all 5 regions of the country. While there, I worked hard to establish relationships with many people from many walks of life. Nearly everywhere I went, I found amazingly literal illustrations of the infamous Brazilian gap between rich and poor. These constructed spaces perfectly reflected what I heard and saw from the Brazilians themselves - that people living 5 minutes apart might as well be living in different continents. However, these communities are complex places, not simply havens for drugs and violence. It was only by demonstrating my respect for that complexity that I was able to even enter these places. So I'm planning a show about the hillside favelas (shantytowns) in Rio de Janiero. I hope to self-publish a short run of books that deal with various marginalized communities - including the favela work - throughout Brazil.






